The impact of rubber monoculture and agroforestry on soil nutrient dynamics: a comparative analysis

Authors

  • Kaushik Saha University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru-560 065, India
  • Anil Kumar K. S. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • K.M Nair ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Lalitha M. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Jagdish Prasad ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur-440033, India
  • Karthika K.S. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Ramesh Kumar S.C. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Ramamurthy V. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • S.P. Maske ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Parvathy S. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Sujata K. ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru-560024, India
  • Jessy M.D. Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam-686609, India
  • James Jacob P. Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam-686609, India

Keywords:

Rubber cultivation, soil acidity, soil available nutrients,, micro nutrients

Abstract

The expansion of rubber monoculture (RM) in tropical regions has led to significant land-use changes, contributing to soil acidification and nutrient depletion. This study evaluates soil nutrient status under three rubber-based land use types (RLUTs) in south-western Karnataka: rubber monoculture (RM), rubber agroforestry (R+AF) and rubber with natural vegetation (R+NV). Results indicated that RM exhibited significantly lower pH, SOC (38 and 71% lower than R+AF and R+NV, respectively) and base cations, but increased soil acidification and exchangeable Al³⁺ and H⁺ concentrations (p <0.05). RM exhibited significantly lower available nutrients compared with R+AF and R+NV (p <0.05), with reductions of 48 and 34% for N, 340 and 30% for P, 26 and 243% for Ca, 73 and 142% for Mg, 67 and 208% for Zn, and 57 and 74% for B, respectively. Available P, Zn and B were found deficient in soils, while iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) were in near toxic concentrations. Soil pH, exchangeable acidity and organic carbon (SOC) are critical in maintaining nutrient availability. SOC was positively correlated with available nutrients, namely N, K, Ca, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn and B, while soil acidity was negatively correlated with available Ca and Mg content. The study recommends avoiding RM or selecting rubber-based agroforestry systems or naturally managed rubber plantations incorporating legumes, cover crops or medicinal plants to improve nutrient availability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

24-03-2026
Dimensions Badge

How to Cite

Saha, K., K. S., A. K., Nair, K., M., L., Prasad, J., K.S., K., … P., J. J. (2026). The impact of rubber monoculture and agroforestry on soil nutrient dynamics: a comparative analysis. Range Management and Agroforestry, 47(01). Retrieved from https://publications.rmsi.in/index.php/rma/article/view/1186

Issue

Section

Research article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.