Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) yield and nutritive characteristics in response to different cutting regimes in a temperate region

Authors

  • Nazim Hamid Mir Regional Research Station, ICAR-IGFRI, Srinagar-191132, India
  • Suheel Ahmad Regional Research Station, ICAR-IGFRI, Srinagar-191132, India
  • Sheeraz Saleem Bhat Regional Research Station, ICAR-IGFRI, Srinagar-191132, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59515/rma.2024.v45.i1.17

Keywords:

Green fodder

Abstract

The present study was carried out at the Research Farm of Regional Research Station, ICAR-IGFRI, Rangreth, Srinagar, to evaluate three harvesting stages and three cutting intervals for achieving higher fodder yield and quality in orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L). Among the harvesting stages, H3 (harvesting at the flowering stage) recorded the highest green (27.04 t/ha) and dry
(8.05 t/ha) fodder yield. Among the cutting intervals, CI 3 (cutting at 60-day intervals) recorded higher fresh and dry biomass yield. Fodder yield increased with harvesting at later stages and increased cutting intervals. The highest crude protein content (11.87%), lowest NDF (55.87%) and ADF (31.65%) contents were recorded when grass was harvested at the vegetative stage. Digestible dry matter (DDM) varied significantly with both harvesting stage and cutting interval and was found to be highest with H1 (64.23%) and CI 1 (63.54%). The highest relative feed value (RFV) of 106.92% and highest total digestible nutrients (TDN) of 65.68% were found in the orchard grass cut at the vegetative stage (H1), which was at par with orchard grass harvested first at the booting stage (H2). Harvesting at both vegetative and booting stages resulted in good quality (RFV >103%) and energy-rich (TDN> 65%) forage. Harvesting at the flowering stage resulted in fair quality (RFV 96.67% and TDN 63.65%) fodder.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Uploaded

29-06-2024
Dimensions Badge

How to Cite

Mir, N. H., Ahmad, S., & Bhat, S. S. (2024). Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) yield and nutritive characteristics in response to different cutting regimes in a temperate region. Range Management and Agroforestry, 45(01), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.59515/rma.2024.v45.i1.17

Issue

Section

Research article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.